Last data update: Apr 29, 2024. (Total: 46658 publications since 2009)
Records 1-30 (of 113 Records) |
Query Trace: McDonald LC[original query] |
---|
Immune response kinetics to SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination among nursing home residents-Georgia, October 2020-July 2022
Chisty ZA , Li DD , Haile M , Houston H , DaSilva J , Overton R , Schuh AJ , Haynie J , Clemente J , Branch AG , Arons MM , Tsang CA , Pellegrini GJ Jr , Bugrysheva J , Ilutsik J , Mohelsky R , Comer P , Hundia SB , Oh H , Stuckey MJ , Bohannon CD , Rasheed MAU , Epperson M , Thornburg NJ , McDonald LC , Brown AC , Kutty PK . PLoS One 2024 19 (4) e0301367 BACKGROUND: Understanding the immune response kinetics to SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination is important in nursing home (NH) residents, a high-risk population. METHODS: An observational longitudinal evaluation of 37 consenting vaccinated NH residents with/without SARS-CoV-2 infection from October 2020 to July 2022 was conducted to characterize the immune response to spike protein due to infection and/or mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Antibodies (IgG) to SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike, nucleocapsid, and receptor binding domain protein antigens were measured, and surrogate virus neutralization capacity was assessed using Meso Scale Discovery immunoassays. The participant's spike exposure status varied depending on the acquisition of infection or receipt of a vaccine dose. Longitudinal linear mixed effects modeling was used to describe trajectories based on the participant's last infection or vaccination; the primary series mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was considered two spike exposures. Mean antibody titer values from participants who developed an infection post receipt of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine were compared with those who did not. In a subset of participants (n = 15), memory B cell (MBC) S-specific IgG (%S IgG) responses were assessed using an ELISPOT assay. RESULTS: The median age of the 37 participants at enrollment was 70.5 years; 30 (81%) had prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 76% received Pfizer-BioNTech and 24% Moderna homologous vaccines. After an observed augmented effect with each spike exposure, a decline in the immune response, including %S IgG MBCs, was observed over time; the percent decline decreased with increasing spike exposures. Participants who developed an infection at least two weeks post-receipt of a vaccine were observed to have lower humoral antibody levels than those who did not develop an infection post-receipt. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that understanding the durability of immune responses in this vulnerable NH population can help inform public health policy regarding the timing of booster vaccinations as new variants display immune escape. |
Characteristics of patients with initial clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) that are associated with increased risk of multiple CDI recurrences
Guh AY , Li R , Korhonen L , Winston LG , Parker E , Czaja CA , Johnston H , Basiliere E , Meek J , Olson D , Fridkin SK , Wilson LE , Perlmutter R , Holzbauer SM , D'Heilly P , Phipps EC , Flores KG , Dumyati GK , Pierce R , Ocampo VLS , Wilson CD , Watkins JJ , Gerding DN , McDonald LC . Open Forum Infect Dis 2024 11 (4) ofae127 BACKGROUND: Because interventions are available to prevent further recurrence in patients with recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI), we identified predictors of multiple rCDI (mrCDI) in adults at the time of presentation with initial CDI (iCDI). METHODS: iCDI was defined as a positive C difficile test in any clinical setting during January 2018-August 2019 in a person aged ≥18 years with no known prior positive test. rCDI was defined as a positive test ≥14 days from the previous positive test within 180 days after iCDI; mrCDI was defined as ≥2 rCDI. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 18 829 patients with iCDI, 882 (4.7%) had mrCDI; 437 with mrCDI and 7484 without mrCDI had full chart reviews. A higher proportion of patients with mrCDI than without mrCDI were aged ≥65 years (57.2% vs 40.7%; P < .0001) and had healthcare (59.1% vs 46.9%; P < .0001) and antibiotic (77.3% vs 67.3%; P < .0001) exposures in the 12 weeks preceding iCDI. In multivariable analysis, age ≥65 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55-2.35), chronic hemodialysis (aOR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.48-3.51), hospitalization (aOR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.33-2.01), and nitrofurantoin use (aOR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.18-3.23) in the 12 weeks preceding iCDI were associated with mrCDI. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with iCDI who are older, on hemodialysis, or had recent hospitalization or nitrofurantoin use had increased risk of mrCDI and may benefit from early use of adjunctive therapy to prevent mrCDI. If confirmed, these findings could aid in clinical decision making and interventional study designs. |
Clinical Course of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Adults with ESKD Receiving Outpatient Hemodialysis
Bardossy AC , Korhonen L , Schatzman S , Gable P , Herzig C , Brown NE , Beshearse E , Varela K , Sabour S , Lyons AK , Overton R , Hudson M , Hernandez-Romieu AC , Alvarez J , Roman K , Weng M , Soda E , Patel PR , Grate C , Dalrymple LS , Wingard RL , Thornburg NJ , Halpin ASL , Folster JM , Tobin-D'Angelo M , Lea J , Apata I , McDonald LC , Brown AC , Kutty PK , Novosad S . Kidney360 12/28/2021 2 (12) 1917-1927 BACKGROUND: Patients with ESKD on maintenance dialysis receive dialysis in common spaces with other patients and have a higher risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 infections. They may have persistently or intermittently positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests after infection. We describe the clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the serologic response in a convenience sample of patients with ESKD to understand the duration of infectivity. METHODS: From August to November 2020, we enrolled patients on maintenance dialysis with SARS-CoV-2 infections from outpatient dialysis facilities in Atlanta, Georgia. We followed participants for approximately 42 days. We assessed COVID-19 symptoms and collected specimens. Oropharyngeal (OP), anterior nasal (AN), and saliva (SA) specimens were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, using RT-PCR, and sent for viral culture. Serology, including neutralizing antibodies, was measured in blood specimens. RESULTS: Fifteen participants, with a median age of 58 (range, 37‒77) years, were enrolled. Median duration of RT-PCR positivity from diagnosis was 18 days (interquartile range [IQR], 8‒24 days). Ten participants had at least one, for a total of 41, positive RT-PCR specimens ≥10 days after symptoms onset. Of these 41 specimens, 21 underwent viral culture; one (5%) was positive 14 days after symptom onset. Thirteen participants developed SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies, 11 of which included neutralizing antibodies. RT-PCRs remained positive after seroconversion in eight participants and after detection of neutralizing antibodies in four participants; however, all of these samples were culture negative. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ESKD on maintenance dialysis remained persistently and intermittently SARS-CoV-2-RT-PCR positive. However, of the 15 participants, only one had infectious virus, on day 14 after symptom onset. Most participants mounted an antibody response, including neutralizing antibodies. Participants continued having RT-PCR-positive results in the presence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies, but without replication-competent virus detected. |
Coronavirus disease 2019 infections among emergency health care personnel: Impact on delivery of United States emergency medical care, 2020
Weber KD , Mower W , Krishnadasan A , Mohr NM , Montoy JC , Rodriguez RM , Giordano PA , Eyck PT , Harland KK , Wallace K , McDonald LC , Kutty PK , Hesse EM , Talan DA . Ann Emerg Med 2024 STUDY OBJECTIVE: In the early months of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and before vaccine availability, there were concerns that infected emergency department (ED) health care personnel could present a threat to the delivery of emergency medical care. We examined how the pandemic affected staffing levels and whether COVID-19 positive staff were potentially infectious at work in a cohort of US ED health care personnel in 2020. METHODS: The COVID-19 Evaluation of Risks in Emergency Departments (Project COVERED) project was a multicenter prospective cohort study of US ED health care personnel conducted from May to December 2020. During surveillance, health care personnel completed weekly electronic surveys and underwent periodic serology and nasal reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction testing for SARS-CoV-2, and investigators captured weekly data on health care facility COVID-19 prevalence and health care personnel staffing. Surveys asked about symptoms, potential exposures, work attendance, personal protective equipment use, and behaviors. RESULTS: We enrolled 1,673 health care personnel who completed 29,825 person weeks of surveillance. Eighty-nine (5.3%) health care personnel documented 90 (0.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2% to 0.4%) person weeks of missed work related to documented or concerns for COVID-19 infection. Health care personnel experienced symptoms of COVID-19 during 1,256 (4.2%) person weeks and worked at least one shift whereas symptomatic during 1,042 (83.0%) of these periods. Seventy-five (4.5%) participants tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during the surveillance period, including 43 (57.3%) who indicated they never experienced symptoms; 74 (98.7%; 95% CI 90.7% to 99.9%) infected health care personnel worked at least one shift during the initial period of infection, and 71 (94.7%) continued working until laboratory confirmation of their infection. Physician staffing was not associated with the facility or community COVID-19 levels within any time frame studied (Kendall tau's 0.02, 0.056, and 0.081 for no shift, one-week time shift, and 2-week time shift, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: During the first wave of the pandemic, COVID-19 infections in ED health care personnel were infrequent, and the time lost from the workforce was minimal. Health care personnel frequently reported for work while infected with SARS-CoV-2 before laboratory confirmation. The ED staffing levels were poorly correlated with facility and community COVID-19 burden. |
Monoclonal antibodies as SARS-CoV-2 serology standards: Experimental validation and broader implications for correlates of protection
Wang L , Patrone PN , Kearsley AJ , Izac JR , Gaigalas AK , Prostko JC , Kwon HJ , Tang W , Kosikova M , Xie H , Tian L , Elsheikh EB , Kwee EJ , Kemp T , Jochum S , Thornburg N , McDonald LC , Gundlapalli AV , Lin-Gibson S . Int J Mol Sci 2023 24 (21) COVID-19 has highlighted challenges in the measurement quality and comparability of serological binding and neutralization assays. Due to many different assay formats and reagents, these measurements are known to be highly variable with large uncertainties. The development of the WHO international standard (WHO IS) and other pool standards have facilitated assay comparability through normalization to a common material but does not provide assay harmonization nor uncertainty quantification. In this paper, we present the results from an interlaboratory study that led to the development of (1) a novel hierarchy of data analyses based on the thermodynamics of antibody binding and (2) a modeling framework that quantifies the probability of neutralization potential for a given binding measurement. Importantly, we introduced a precise, mathematical definition of harmonization that separates the sources of quantitative uncertainties, some of which can be corrected to enable, for the first time, assay comparability. Both the theory and experimental data confirmed that mAbs and WHO IS performed identically as a primary standard for establishing traceability and bridging across different assay platforms. The metrological anchoring of complex serological binding and neuralization assays and fast turn-around production of an mAb reference control can enable the unprecedented comparability and traceability of serological binding assay results for new variants of SARS-CoV-2 and immune responses to other viruses. |
Longitudinal serologic and viral testing post-SARS-CoV-2 infection and post-receipt of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in a nursing home cohort-Georgia, October 2020-April 2021 (preprint)
Tobolowsky FA , Waltenburg MA , Moritz ED , Haile M , DaSilva JC , Schuh AJ , Thornburg NJ , Westbrook A , McKay SL , LaVoie SP , Folster JM , Harcourt JL , Tamin A , Stumpf MM , Mills L , Freeman B , Lester S , Beshearse E , Lecy KD , Brown LG , Fajardo G , Negley J , McDonald LC , Kutty PK , Brown AC , Bhatnagar A , Bryant-Genevier J , Currie DW , Campbell D , Gilbert SE , Hatfield KM , Jackson DA , Jernigan JA , Dawson JL , Hudson MJ , Joseph K , Reddy SC , Wilson MM . medRxiv 2022 01 (10) e0275718 Importance: There are limited data describing SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses and their durability following infection and vaccination in nursing home residents. Objective(s): To evaluate the quantitative titers and durability of binding antibodies detected after SARSCoV-2 infection and subsequent COVID-19 vaccination. Design(s): A prospective longitudinal evaluation included nine visits over 150 days; visits included questionnaire administration, blood collection for serology, and paired anterior nasal specimen collection for testing by BinaxNOWTM COVID-19 Ag Card (BinaxNOW), reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and viral culture. Setting(s): A nursing home during and after a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. Participant(s): 11 consenting SARS-CoV-2-positive nursing home residents. Main Outcomes and Measures: SARS-CoV-2 testing (BinaxNOWTM, RT-PCR, viral culture); quantitative titers of binding SARS-CoV-2 antibodies post-infection and post-vaccination (beginning after the first dose of the primary series). Result(s): Of 10 participants with post-infection serology results, 9 (90%) had detectable Pan-Ig, IgG, and IgA antibodies and 8 (80%) had detectable IgM antibodies. At first antibody detection post-infection, two-thirds (6/9, 67%) of participants were RT-PCR-positive but none were culture positive. Ten participants received vaccination; all had detectable Pan-Ig, IgG, and IgA antibodies through their final observation <=90 days post-first dose. Post-vaccination geometric means of IgG titers were 10-200-fold higher than post-infection. Conclusions and Relevance: Nursing home residents in this cohort mounted robust immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 post-infection and post-vaccination. The augmented antibody responses post-vaccination are potential indicators of enhanced protection that vaccination may confer on previously infected nursing home residents. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license. |
SARS-CoV-2 convalescent sera binding and neutralizing antibody concentrations compared with COVID-19 vaccine efficacy estimates against symptomatic infection (preprint)
Schuh AJ , Satheshkumar PS , Dietz S , Bull-Otterson L , Charles M , Edens C , Jones JM , Bajema KL , Clarke KEN , McDonald LC , Patel S , Cuffe K , Thornburg NJ , Schiffer J , Chun K , Bastidas M , Fernando M , Petropoulos CJ , Wrin T , Cai S , Adcock D , Sesok-Pizzini D , Letovsky S , Fry AM , Hall AJ , Gundlapalli AV . medRxiv 2021 26 Previous vaccine efficacy (VE) studies have estimated neutralizing and binding antibody concentrations that correlate with protection from symptomatic infection; how these estimates compare to those generated in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection is unclear. Here, we assessed quantitative neutralizing and binding antibody concentrations using standardized SARS-CoV-2 assays on 3,067 serum specimens collected during July 27, 2020-August 27, 2020 from COVID-19 unvaccinated persons with detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using qualitative antibody assays. Quantitative neutralizing and binding antibody concentrations were strongly positively correlated (r=0.76, p<0.0001) and were noted to be several fold lower in the unvaccinated study population as compared to published data on concentrations noted 28 days post-vaccination. In this convenience sample, ~88% of neutralizing and ~63-86% of binding antibody concentrations met or exceeded concentrations associated with 70% COVID-19 VE against symptomatic infection from published VE studies; ~30% of neutralizing and 1-14% of binding antibody concentrations met or exceeded concentrations associated with 90% COVID-19 VE. These data support observations of infection-induced immunity and current recommendations for vaccination post infection to maximize protection against symptomatic COVID-19. Copyright The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license. |
Development and validation of an enzyme immunoassay for detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 salivary IgA and IgG (preprint)
Costantini VP , Nguyen K , Lyski Z , Novosad S , Bardossy AC , Lyons AK , Gable P , Kutty PK , Lutgring JD , Brunton A , Thornburg NJ , Brown AC , McDonald LC , Messer W , Vinjé J . medRxiv 2021 Oral fluids offer a non-invasive sampling method for the detection of antibodies. Quantification of IgA and IgG antibodies in saliva allows studies of the mucosal and systemic immune response after natural infection or vaccination. We developed and validated an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to detect and quantify salivary IgA and IgG antibodies against the prefusion-stabilized form of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Normalization against total antibody isotype was performed to account for specimen differences, such as collection time and sample volume. Saliva samples collected from 187 SARS-CoV-2 confirmed cases enrolled in 2 cohorts and 373 pre-pandemic saliva samples were tested. The sensitivity of both EIAs was high (IgA: 95.5%; IgG: 89.7%) without compromising specificity (IgA: 99%; IgG: 97%). No cross reactivity with seasonal coronaviruses was observed. The limit of detection for SARS-CoV-2 salivary IgA and IgG assays were 1.98 ng/mL and 0.30 ng/mL, respectively. Salivary IgA and IgG antibodies were detected earlier in patients with mild COVID-19 symptoms than in severe cases. However, severe cases showed higher salivary antibody titers than those with a mild infection. Salivary IgA titers quickly decreased after 6 weeks in mild cases but remained detectable until at least week 10 in severe cases. Salivary IgG titers remained high for all patients, regardless of disease severity. In conclusion, EIAs for both IgA and IgG had high specificity and sensitivity for the confirmation of current or recent SARS-CoV-2 infections and evaluation of the IgA and IgG immune response. |
Using colonization to understand the burden of antimicrobial resistance across low- and middle-income countries
Styczynski A , Herzig C , Luvsansharav UO , McDonald LC , Smith RM . Clin Infect Dis 2023 77 S70-s74 Understanding the burden of antibiotic resistance globally is hindered by incomplete surveillance, particularly across low-resource settings. The Antibiotic Resistance in Communities and Hospitals (ARCH) consortium encompasses sites across 6 resource-limited settings and is intended to address these gaps. Supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the ARCH studies seek to characterize the burden of antibiotic resistance by examining colonization prevalence at the community and hospital level and to evaluate for risk factors that are associated with colonization. In this supplement, 7 articles present results from these initial studies. Though future studies identifying and evaluating prevention strategies will be critical to mitigate spreading resistance and its impact on populations, the findings from these studies address important questions surrounding the epidemiology of antibiotic resistance. |
The CDC response to antibiotic and antifungal resistance in the environment
Sievert D , Kirby A , McDonald LC . Med 2021 2 (4) 365-369 Antibiotic resistance challenges public health on many fronts, and it is increasingly clear that it must be addressed in the environment to control emerging resistance and infections in humans and animals. Here, we outline how the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is addressing antibiotic resistance in the environment. |
Implementation and Evolution of Mitigation Measures, Testing, and Contact Tracing in the National Football League, August 9-November 21, 2020.
Mack CD , Wasserman EB , Perrine CG , MacNeil A , Anderson DJ , Myers E , Smith S , McDonald LC , Osterholm M , Solomon GS , Mayer T , Sills A , NFL COVID-19 Advisory and Operational Team . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021 70 (4) 130-135 The National Football League (NFL) and the NFL Players Association (NFLPA) began the 2020 football season in July, implementing extensive mitigation and surveillance measures in facilities and during travel and gameplay. Mitigation protocols* were evaluated and modified based on data from routine reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19); proximity tracking devices; and detailed interviews. Midseason, transmission was observed in persons who had cumulative interactions of <15 minutes' duration, leading to a revised definition of high-risk contacts that required consideration of mask use, setting and room ventilation in addition to proximity and duration of interaction. The NFL also developed an intensive protocol that imposed stricter infection prevention precautions when a case was identified at an NFL club. The intensive protocol effectively prevented the occurrence of high-risk interactions, with no high-risk contacts identified for 71% of traced cases at clubs under the intensive protocol. The incorporation of the nature and location of the interaction, including mask use, indoor versus outdoor setting, and ventilation, in addition to proximity and duration, likely improved identification of exposed persons at higher risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Quarantine of these persons, along with testing and intensive protocols, can reduce spread of infection. |
Pandemic demand for SARS-CoV-2 testing led to critical supply and workforce shortages in U.S. clinical and public health laboratories
Cornish NE , Bachmann LH , Diekema DJ , McDonald LC , McNult P , Stevens-Garcia J , Raphael BH , Miller MB . J Clin Microbiol 2023 61 (7) e0318920 COVID-19 has brought unprecedented challenges to clinical and public health laboratories. While U.S. laboratories have continued striving to provide quality test results during the pandemic, the uncertainty and lack of supplies became a significant hurdle, hindering day-to-day laboratory operations and the ability to increase testing capacity for both SARS-CoV-2 and non-COVID-19 testing. In addition, long-standing laboratory workforce shortages became apparent, hindering the ability of clinical and public health laboratories to rapidly increase testing. The American Society for Microbiology, the College of American Pathologists, the National Coalition of STD Directors, and the Emerging Infections Network independently conducted surveys in 2020 and early 2021 to assess the capacity of the nation's clinical laboratories to respond to the increase in demand for testing during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of these surveys highlighted the shortages of crucial supplies for SARS-CoV-2 testing and supplies for other routine laboratory diagnostics, as well as a shortage of trained personnel to perform testing. The conclusions are based on communications, observations, and the survey results of the clinical laboratory, public health, and professional organizations represented here. While the results of each survey considered separately may not be representative of the entire community, when considered together they provide remarkably similar results, further validating the findings and highlighting the importance of laboratory supply chains and the personnel capable of performing these tests for any response to a large-scale public health emergency. |
Use of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibody tests by US infectious disease physicians: Results of an emerging infections network survey, March 2022
Gundlapalli AV , Beekmann SE , Jones JM , Thornburg NJ , Clarke KEN , Uyeki TM , Satheshkumar PS , Carroll DS , Plumb ID , Briggs-Hagen M , Santibañez S , David-Ferdon C , Polgreen PM , McDonald LC . Open Forum Infect Dis 2023 10 (3) ofad091 BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody tests have had limited recommended clinical application during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. To inform clinical practice, an understanding is needed of current perspectives of United States-based infectious disease (ID) physicians on the use, interpretation, and need for SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests. METHODS: In March 2022, members of the Emerging Infections Network (EIN), a national network of practicing ID physicians, were surveyed on types of SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays ordered, interpretation of test results, and clinical scenarios for which antibody tests were considered. RESULTS: Of 1867 active EIN members, 747 (40%) responded. Among the 583 who managed or consulted on COVID-19 patients, a majority (434/583 [75%]) had ordered SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests and were comfortable interpreting positive (452/578 [78%]) and negative (405/562 [72%]) results. Antibody tests were used for diagnosing post-COVID-19 conditions (61%), identifying prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (60%), and differentiating prior infection and response to COVID-19 vaccination (37%). Less than a third of respondents had used antibody tests to assess need for additional vaccines or risk stratification. Lack of sufficient evidence for use and nonstandardized assays were among the most common barriers for ordering tests. Respondents indicated that statements from professional societies and government agencies would influence their decision to order SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests for clinical decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Practicing ID physicians are using SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests, and there is an unmet need for clarifying the appropriate use of these tests in clinical practice. Professional societies and US government agencies can support clinicians in the community through the creation of appropriate guidance. |
Vital Signs: Health disparities in hemodialysis-associated staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections - United States, 2017-2020
Rha B , See I , Dunham L , Kutty PK , Moccia L , Apata IW , Ahern J , Jung S , Li R , Nadle J , Petit S , Ray SM , Harrison LH , Bernu C , Lynfield R , Dumyati G , Tracy M , Schaffner W , Ham DC , Magill SS , O'Leary EN , Bell J , Srinivasan A , McDonald LC , Edwards JR , Novosad S . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023 72 (6) 153-159 INTRODUCTION: Racial and ethnic minorities are disproportionately affected by end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). ESKD patients on dialysis are at increased risk for Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections, but racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities associated with this outcome are not well described. METHODS: Surveillance data from the 2020 National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) and the 2017-2020 Emerging Infections Program (EIP) were used to describe bloodstream infections among patients on hemodialysis (hemodialysis patients) and were linked to population-based data sources (CDC/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry [ATSDR] Social Vulnerability Index [SVI], United States Renal Data System [USRDS], and U.S. Census Bureau) to examine associations with race, ethnicity, and social determinants of health. RESULTS: In 2020, 4,840 dialysis facilities reported 14,822 bloodstream infections to NHSN; 34.2% were attributable to S. aureus. Among seven EIP sites, the S. aureus bloodstream infection rate during 2017-2020 was 100 times higher among hemodialysis patients (4,248 of 100,000 person-years) than among adults not on hemodialysis (42 of 100,000 person-years). Unadjusted S. aureus bloodstream infection rates were highest among non-Hispanic Black or African American (Black) and Hispanic or Latino (Hispanic) hemodialysis patients. Vascular access via central venous catheter was strongly associated with S. aureus bloodstream infections (NHSN: adjusted rate ratio [aRR] = 6.2; 95% CI = 5.7-6.7 versus fistula; EIP: aRR = 4.3; 95% CI = 3.9-4.8 versus fistula or graft). Adjusting for EIP site of residence, sex, and vascular access type, S. aureus bloodstream infection risk in EIP was highest in Hispanic patients (aRR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.2-1.7 versus non-Hispanic White [White] patients), and patients aged 18-49 years (aRR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.5-1.9 versus patients aged ≥65 years). Areas with higher poverty levels, crowding, and lower education levels accounted for disproportionately higher proportions of hemodialysis-associated S. aureus bloodstream infections. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE: Disparities exist in hemodialysis-associated S. aureus infections. Health care providers and public health professionals should prioritize prevention and optimized treatment of ESKD, identify and address barriers to lower-risk vascular access placement, and implement established best practices to prevent bloodstream infections. |
Selective and cascade reporting of antimicrobial susceptibility testing results and its impact on antimicrobial resistance surveillance-National Healthcare Safety Network, April 2020 to March 2021
Wu H , Lutgring JD , McDonald LC , Webb A , Fields V , Blum L , Mojica M , Edwards J , Soe MM , Pollock DA . Microbiol Spectr 2023 11 (2) e0164622 Selective or cascade reporting (SR/CR) of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results is a strategy for antimicrobial stewardship. SR/CR is often achieved by suppressing AST results of secondary drugs in electronic laboratory reports. We assessed the extent of SR/CR and its impact on cumulative antibiograms (CAs) in a large cohort of U.S. hospitals submitting AST data to the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) through electronic data exchange. The NHSN calls for hospitals to extract AST data from their electronic systems. We analyzed the AST reported for Escherichia coli (blood and urine) and Staphylococcus aureus (blood and lower respiratory tract [LRT]) isolates from April 2020 to March 2021, used AST reporting patterns to assign SR/CR reporting status for hospitals, and compared their CAs. Sensitivity analyses were done to account for those potentially extracted complete data. At least 35% and 41% of the hospitals had AST data that were suppressed in more than 20% blood isolates for E. coli and S. aureus isolates, respectively. At least 63% (blood) and 50% (urine) routinely reported ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin for E. coli isolates; and 60% (blood) and 59% (LRT) routinely reported vancomycin for S. aureus isolates. The distribution of CAs for many agents differed between high SR/CR and low- or non-SR/CR hospitals. Hospitals struggled to obtain complete AST data through electronic data exchange because of data suppression. Use of SR/CR can bias CAs if incomplete data are used. Technical solutions are needed for extracting complete AST results for public health surveillance. IMPORTANCE This study is the first to assess the extent of using selective and/or cascade antimicrobial susceptibility reporting for antimicrobial stewardship among U.S. hospitals and its impact on cumulative antibiograms in the context of electronic data exchange for national antimicrobial resistance surveillance. |
SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses to the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain and Omicron BA.1 and BA.4/BA.5 variants in nursing home residents after receipt of bivalent COVID-19 vaccine - Ohio and Rhode Island, September-November 2022
Canaday DH , Oyebanji OA , White EM , Bosch J , Nugent C , Vishnepolskiy I , Abul Y , Didion EM , Paxitzis A , Sundheimer N , Ragavapuram V , Wilk D , Keresztesy D , Cao Y , St Denis K , McConeghy KW , McDonald LC , Jernigan JA , Mylonakis E , Wilson BM , King CL , Balazs AB , Gravenstein S . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023 72 (4) 100-106 Introduction of monovalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in late 2020 helped to mitigate disproportionate COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality in U.S. nursing homes (1); however, reduced effectiveness of monovalent vaccines during the period of Omicron variant predominance led to recommendations for booster doses with bivalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccines that include an Omicron BA.4/BA.5 spike protein component to broaden immune response and improve vaccine effectiveness against circulating Omicron variants (2). Recent studies suggest that bivalent booster doses provide substantial additional protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19-associated disease among immunocompetent adults who previously received only monovalent vaccines (3).* The immunologic response after receipt of bivalent boosters among nursing home residents, who often mount poor immunologic responses to vaccines, remains unknown. Serial testing of anti-spike protein antibody binding and neutralizing antibody titers in serum collected from 233 long-stay nursing home residents from the time of their primary vaccination series and including any subsequent booster doses, including the bivalent vaccine, was performed. The bivalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccine substantially increased anti-spike and neutralizing antibody titers against Omicron sublineages, including BA.1 and BA.4/BA.5, irrespective of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection or previous receipt of 1 or 2 booster doses. These data, in combination with evidence of low uptake of bivalent booster vaccination among residents and staff members in nursing homes (4), support the recommendation that nursing home residents and staff members receive a bivalent COVID-19 booster dose to reduce associated morbidity and mortality (2). |
Endotracheal Intubation Strategy, Success, and Adverse Events Among Emergency Department Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Mohr NM , Santos Leon E , Carlson JN , Driver B , Krishnadasan A , Harland KK , Ten Eyck P , Mower WR , Foley TM , Wallace K , McDonald LC , Kutty PK , Santibanez S , Talan DA . Ann Emerg Med 2022 81 (2) 145-157 STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe endotracheal intubation practices in emergency departments by staff intubating patients early in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: Multicenter prospective cohort study of endotracheal intubations conducted at 20 US academic emergency departments from May to December 2020, stratified by known or suspected COVID-19 status. We used multivariable regression to measure the association between intubation strategy, COVID-19 known or suspected status, first-pass success, and adverse events. RESULTS: There were 3,435 unique emergency department endotracheal intubations by 586 participating physicians or advanced practice providers; 565 (18%) patients were known or suspected of having COVID-19 at the time of endotracheal intubation. Compared with patients not known or suspected of COVID-19, endotracheal intubations of patients with known or suspected COVID-19 were more often performed using video laryngoscopy (88% versus 82%, difference 6.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0% to 9.6%) and passive nasal oxygenation (44% versus 39%, difference 5.1%; 95% CI, 0.9% to 9.3%). First-pass success was not different between those who were and were not known or suspected of COVID-19 (87% versus 86%, difference 0.6%; 95% CI, -2.4% to 3.6%). Adjusting for patient characteristics and procedure factors in those with low anticipated airway difficulty (n=2,374), adverse events (most commonly hypoxia) occurred more frequently in patients with known or suspected COVID-19 (35% versus 19%, adjusted odds ratio 2.4; 95% CI, 1.7 to 3.3). CONCLUSION: Compared with patients not known or suspected of COVID-19, endotracheal intubation of those confirmed or suspected to have COVID-19 was associated with a similar first-pass intubation success rate but higher risk-adjusted adverse events. |
Longitudinal serologic and viral testing post-SARS-CoV-2 infection and post-receipt of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in a nursing home cohort-Georgia, October 2020‒April 2021.
Tobolowsky FA , Waltenburg MA , Moritz ED , Haile M , DaSilva JC , Schuh AJ , Thornburg NJ , Westbrook A , McKay SL , LaVoie SP , Folster JM , Harcourt JL , Tamin A , Stumpf MM , Mills L , Freeman B , Lester S , Beshearse E , Lecy KD , Brown LG , Fajardo G , Negley J , McDonald LC , Kutty PK , Brown AC , Bhatnagar A , Bryant-Genevier J , Currie DW , Campbell D , Gilbert SE , Hatfield KM , Jackson DA , Jernigan JA , Dawson JL , Hudson MJ , Joseph K , Reddy SC , Wilson MM . PLoS One 2022 17 (10) e0275718 There are limited data describing SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses and their durability following infection and vaccination in nursing home residents. We conducted a prospective longitudinal evaluation of 11 consenting SARS-CoV-2-positive nursing home residents to evaluate the quantitative titers and durability of binding antibodies detected after SARS-CoV-2 infection and subsequent COVID-19 vaccination. The evaluation included nine visits over 150 days from October 25, 2020, through April 1, 2021. Visits included questionnaire administration, blood collection for serology, and paired anterior nasal specimen collection for testing by BinaxNOW™ COVID-19 Ag Card (BinaxNOW), reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and viral culture. We evaluated quantitative titers of binding SARS-CoV-2 antibodies post-infection and post-vaccination (beginning after the first dose of the primary series). The median age among participants was 74 years; one participant was immunocompromised. Of 10 participants with post-infection serology results, 9 (90%) had detectable Pan-Ig, IgG, and IgA antibodies, and 8 (80%) had detectable IgM antibodies. At first antibody detection post-infection, two-thirds (6/9, 67%) of participants were RT-PCR-positive, but none were culture- positive. Ten participants received vaccination; all had detectable Pan-Ig, IgG, and IgA antibodies through their final observation ≤90 days post-first dose. Post-vaccination geometric means of IgG titers were 10-200-fold higher than post-infection. Nursing home residents in this cohort mounted robust immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 post-infection and post-vaccination. The augmented antibody responses post-vaccination are potential indicators of enhanced protection that vaccination may confer on previously infected nursing home residents. |
Reference Susceptibility Testing and Genomic Surveillance of Clostridioides difficile, United States, 2012-17.
Gargis AS , Karlsson M , Paulick AL , Anderson KF , Adamczyk M , Vlachos N , Kent AG , McAllister GA , McKay SL , Halpin AL , Albrecht V , Campbell D , Korhonen L , Elkins CA , Rasheed JK , Guh AY , McDonald LC , Lutgring JD . Clin Infect Dis 2022 76 (5) 890-896 BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is not routinely performed for Clostridioides difficile and data evaluating minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) are limited. We performed AST and whole genome sequencing (WGS) for 593 C. difficile isolates collected between 2012-2017 through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Emerging Infections Program. METHODS: MICs to six antimicrobial agents (ceftriaxone, clindamycin, meropenem, metronidazole, moxifloxacin, and vancomycin) were determined using the reference agar dilution method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. WGS was performed on all isolates to detect the presence of genes or mutations previously associated with resistance. RESULTS: Among all isolates, 98.5% displayed a vancomycin MIC ≤ 2 μg/mL and 97.3% displayed a metronidazole MIC ≤ 2 μg/mL. Ribotype 027 (RT027) isolates displayed higher vancomycin MICs (MIC50: 2 μg/mL; MIC90: 2 μg/mL) than non-RT027 isolates (MIC50: 0.5 μg/mL; MIC90: 1 μg/mL) (P < 0.01). No vanA/B genes were detected. RT027 isolates also showed higher MICs to clindamycin and moxifloxacin and were more likely to harbor associated resistance genes or mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated MICs to antibiotics used for treatment of C. difficile infection were rare and there was no increase in MICs over time. The lack of vanA/B genes or mutations consistently associated with elevated vancomycin MICs suggests there are multifactorial mechanisms of resistance. Ongoing surveillance of C. difficile using reference AST and WGS to monitor MIC trends and the presence of antibiotic resistance mechanisms is essential. |
Emergency department personnel patient care-related COVID-19 risk.
Mohr NM , Krishnadasan A , Harland KK , Ten Eyck P , Mower WR , Schrading WA , Montoy JCC , McDonald LC , Kutty PK , Hesse E , Santibanez S , Weissman DN , Slev P , Talan DA . PLoS One 2022 17 (7) e0271597 OBJECTIVES: Emergency department (ED) health care personnel (HCP) are at risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2. The objective of this study was to determine the attributable risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection from providing ED care, describe personal protective equipment use, and identify modifiable ED risk factors. We hypothesized that providing ED patient care increases the probability of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study of 1,673 ED physicians, advanced practice providers (APPs), nurses, and nonclinical staff at 20 U.S. centers over 20 weeks (May to December 2020; before vaccine availability) to detect a four-percentage point increased SARS-CoV-2 incidence among HCP related to direct patient care. Participants provided monthly nasal and serology specimens and weekly exposure and procedure information. We used multivariable regression and recursive partitioning to identify risk factors. RESULTS: Over 29,825 person-weeks, 75 participants (4.5%) acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection (31 were asymptomatic). Physicians/APPs (aOR 1.07; 95% CI 0.56-2.03) did not have higher risk of becoming infected compared to nonclinical staff, but nurses had a marginally increased risk (aOR 1.91; 95% CI 0.99-3.68). Over 99% of participants used CDC-recommended personal protective equipment (PPE), but PPE lapses occurred in 22.1% of person-weeks and 32.1% of SARS-CoV-2-infected patient intubations. The following factors were associated with infection: household SARS-CoV-2 exposure; hospital and community SARS-CoV-2 burden; community exposure; and mask non-use in public. SARS-CoV-2 intubation was not associated with infection (attributable risk fraction 13.8%; 95% CI -2.0-38.2%), and nor were PPE lapses. CONCLUSIONS: Among unvaccinated U.S. ED HCP during the height of the pandemic, the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection was similar in nonclinical staff and HCP engaged in direct patient care. Many identified risk factors were related to community exposures. |
SARS-CoV-2 Convalescent Sera Binding and Neutralizing Antibody Concentrations Compared with COVID-19 Vaccine Efficacy Estimates against Symptomatic Infection.
Schuh AJ , Satheshkumar PS , Dietz S , Bull-Otterson L , Charles M , Edens C , Jones JM , Bajema KL , Clarke KEN , McDonald LC , Patel S , Cuffe K , Thornburg NJ , Schiffer J , Chun K , Bastidas M , Fernando M , Petropoulos CJ , Wrin T , Cai S , Adcock D , Sesok-Pizzini D , Letovsky S , Fry AM , Hall AJ , Gundlapalli AV . Microbiol Spectr 2022 10 (4) e0124722 Previous COVID-19 vaccine efficacy (VE) studies have estimated neutralizing and binding antibody concentrations that correlate with protection from symptomatic infection; how these estimates compare to those generated in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection is unclear. Here, we assessed quantitative neutralizing and binding antibody concentrations using standardized SARS-CoV-2 assays on 3,067 serum specimens collected during 27 July 2020 to 27 August 2020 from COVID-19-unvaccinated persons with detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Neutralizing and binding antibody concentrations were severalfold lower in the unvaccinated study population compared to published concentrations at 28 days postvaccination. In this convenience sample, ~88% of neutralizing and ~63 to 86% of binding antibody concentrations met or exceeded concentrations associated with 70% COVID-19 VE against symptomatic infection; ~30% of neutralizing and 1 to 14% of binding antibody concentrations met or exceeded concentrations associated with 90% COVID-19 VE. Our study not only supports observations of infection-induced immunity and current recommendations for vaccination postinfection to maximize protection against COVID-19, but also provides a large data set of pre-COVID-19 vaccination anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentrations that will serve as an important comparator in the current setting of vaccine-induced and hybrid immunity. As new SARS-CoV-2 variants emerge and displace circulating virus strains, we recommend that standardized binding antibody assays that include spike protein-based antigens be utilized to estimate antibody concentrations correlated with protection from COVID-19. These estimates will be helpful in informing public health guidance, such as the need for additional COVID-19 vaccine booster doses to prevent symptomatic infection. IMPORTANCE Although COVID-19 vaccine efficacy (VE) studies have estimated antibody concentrations that correlate with protection from COVID-19, how these estimates compare to those generated in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection is unclear. We assessed quantitative neutralizing and binding antibody concentrations using standardized assays on serum specimens collected from COVID-19-unvaccinated persons with detectable antibodies. We found that most unvaccinated persons with qualitative antibody evidence of prior infection had quantitative antibody concentrations that met or exceeded concentrations associated with 70% VE against COVID-19. However, only a small proportion had antibody concentrations that met or exceeded concentrations associated with 90% VE, suggesting that persons with prior COVID-19 would benefit from vaccination to maximize protective antibody concentrations against COVID-19. |
Are vancomycin non-susceptible clostridioides difficile strains emerging
Lutgring JD , McKay SL , Gargis AS , Halpin AL , McDonald LC . Clin Infect Dis 2022 75 (9) 1677-1678 TO THE EDITORWe read with concern the report by Darkoh and colleagues describing vancomycin resistance in Clostridioides difficile isolates recovered from patients in Houston, Texas, and Nairobi, Kenya [1]. The authors suggested that vancomycin resistance, which they found to be common, may lead to therapeutic failure for patients infected with C. difficile and that routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) should be expanded. The authors report that 26% of C. difficile toxin gene-positive patients in Houston and 67% of sequential hospitalized patients in Nairobi with acute diarrhea had growth on primary screening media containing 4g/mL vancomycin. This alarmingly high proportion of a vancomycin resistant phenotype exceeds initial treatment failure rates reported in the literature [2], calling into question the reliability of these findings. |
Development and Validation of an Enzyme Immunoassay for Detection and Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Salivary IgA and IgG.
Costantini VP , Nguyen K , Lyski Z , Novosad S , Bardossy AC , Lyons AK , Gable P , Kutty PK , Lutgring JD , Brunton A , Thornburg NJ , Brown AC , McDonald LC , Messer W , Vinj J . J Immunol 2022 208 (6) 1500-1508 Oral fluids offer a noninvasive sampling method for the detection of Abs. Quantification of IgA and IgG Abs in saliva allows studies of the mucosal and systemic immune response after natural infection or vaccination. We developed and validated an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to detect and quantify salivary IgA and IgG Abs against the prefusion-stabilized form of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein expressed in suspension-adapted HEK-293 cells. Normalization against total Ab isotype was performed to account for specimen differences, such as collection time and sample volume. Saliva samples collected from 187 SARS-CoV-2 confirmed cases enrolled in 2 cohorts and 373 prepandemic saliva samples were tested. The sensitivity of both EIAs was high (IgA, 95.5%; IgG, 89.7%) without compromising specificity (IgA, 99%; IgG, 97%). No cross-reactivity with endemic coronaviruses was observed. The limit of detection for SARS-CoV-2 salivary IgA and IgG assays were 1.98 ng/ml and 0.30 ng/ml, respectively. Salivary IgA and IgG Abs were detected earlier in patients with mild COVID-19 symptoms than in severe cases. However, severe cases showed higher salivary Ab titers than those with a mild infection. Salivary IgA titers quickly decreased after 6 wk in mild cases but remained detectable until at least week 10 in severe cases. Salivary IgG titers remained high for all patients, regardless of disease severity. In conclusion, EIAs for both IgA and IgG had high specificity and sensitivity for the confirmation of current or recent SARS-CoV-2 infections and evaluation of the IgA and IgG immune response. |
Descriptive Evaluation of Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Plasma and Gingival Crevicular Fluid in a Nursing Home Cohort-Arkansas, June-August 2020.
Brown NE , Lyons AK , Schuh AJ , Stumpf MM , Harcourt JL , Tamin A , Rasheed MAU , Mills L , Lester SN , Thornburg NJ , Nguyen K , Costantini V , Vinjé J , Huang JY , Gilbert SE , Gable P , Bollinger S , Sabour S , Beshearse E , Surie D , Biedron C , Gregory CJ , Clemmons NS , Whitaker B , Coughlin MM , Seely KA , Garner K , Gulley T , Haney T , Kothari A , Patil N , Halpin AL , McDonald LC , Kutty PK , Brown AC . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021 43 (11) 1-24 OBJECTIVE: Characterize and compare SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses in plasma and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) from nursing home residents during and after natural infection. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: Nursing home. PARTICIPANTS: SARS-CoV-2-infected nursing home residents. METHODS: A convenience sample of 14 SARS-CoV-2-infected nursing home residents, enrolled 4-13 days after real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction diagnosis, were followed for 42 days. Post diagnosis, plasma SARS-CoV-2-specific pan-Immunoglobulin (Ig), IgG, IgA, IgM, and neutralizing antibodies were measured at 5 timepoints and GCF SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and IgA were measured at 4 timepoints. RESULTS: All participants demonstrated immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among 12 phlebotomized participants, plasma was positive for pan-Ig and IgG in all 12, neutralizing antibodies in 11, IgM in 10, and IgA in 9. Among 14 participants with GCF specimens, GCF was positive for IgG in 13 and IgA in 12. Immunoglobulin responses in plasma and GCF had similar kinetics; median times to peak antibody response was similar across specimen types (4 weeks for IgG; 3 weeks for IgA). Participants with pan-Ig, IgG, and IgA detected in plasma and GCF IgG remained positive through this evaluation's end 46-55 days post-diagnosis. All participants were viral culture negative by the first detection of antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing home residents had detectable SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in plasma and GCF after infection. Kinetics of antibodies detected in GCF mirrored those from plasma. Non-invasive GCF may be useful for detecting and monitoring immunologic responses in populations unable or unwilling to be phlebotomized. |
Research on the Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 in Essential Response Personnel (RECOVER): Protocol for a Multisite Longitudinal Cohort Study.
Edwards LJ , Fowlkes AL , Wesley MG , Kuntz JL , Odean MJ , Caban-Martinez AJ , Dunnigan K , Phillips AL , Grant L , Herring MK , Groom HC , Respet K , Beitel S , Zunie T , Hegmann KT , Kumar A , Joseph G , Poe B , Louzado-Feliciano P , Smith ME , Thiese MS , Schaefer-Solle N , Yoo YM , Silvera CA , Mayo Lamberte J , Mak J , McDonald LC , Stuckey MJ , Kutty P , Arvay ML , Yoon SK , Tyner HL , Burgess JL , Hunt DR , Meece J , Gaglani M , Naleway AL , Thompson MG . JMIR Res Protoc 2021 10 (12) e31574 BACKGROUND: Workers critical to emergency response and continuity of essential services during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are at a disproportionally high risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Prospective cohort studies are needed to enhance understanding the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, identifying risk factors, assessing clinical outcomes, and determining the effectiveness of vaccination. OBJECTIVE: The Research on the Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 in Essential Response personnel (RECOVER) prospective cohort study was designed to estimate the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, examine risk factors for infection and clinical spectrum of illness, and assess effectiveness of vaccination among essential workers. METHODS: The RECOVER multi-site network was initiated in August 2020 and aims to enroll 3,000 healthcare personnel (HCP), first responders, and other essential and frontline workers (EFW) in six U.S. locations. Data on participant demographics, medical history, and vaccination history are collected at baseline and throughout the study. Active surveillance for symptoms of COVID-19-like illness (CLI), accessing medical care, and symptom duration are ascertained by text messages, e-mails, and direct participant or medical record reports. Participants self-collect a mid-turbinate nasal swab weekly, regardless of symptoms, and two additional respiratory specimens at the onset of CLI. Blood is collected upon enrollment, every three months, approximately 28 days after a reverse-transcription-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 14-28 days after a dose of any COVID-19 vaccine. Beginning in February 2021, household members of RT-PCR-confirmed participants self-collect mid-turbinate nasal swabs daily for ten days. RESULTS: The study observation period began in August 2020 and is currently expected to continue through spring 2022. There are 2,623 actively enrolled RECOVER participants, including 252 participants who were found to be positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. Enrollment is ongoing at three of six study site locations. CONCLUSIONS: Data collected through the cohort are expected to provide important public health information for essential workers at high risk for occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and allow early evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT: DERR1-10.2196/31574. |
Repeated Antigen Testing Among SARS-CoV-2-Positive Nursing Home Residents.
Moritz ED , McKay SL , Tobolowsky FA , LaVoie SP , Waltenburg MA , Lecy KD , Thornburg NJ , Harcourt JL , Tamin A , Folster JM , Negley J , Brown AC , McDonald LC , Kutty PK . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021 43 (12) 1-10 Repeated antigen testing of 12 SARS-CoV-2-positive nursing home residents using Abbott BinaxNOW™ identified 9/9 (100%) culture-positive specimens up to 6 days after initial positive test. Antigen positivity lasted 2-24 days. Antigen positivity might last beyond the infectious period, but was reliable in residents with evidence of early infection. |
Advancing diagnostic stewardship for healthcare associated infections, antibiotic resistance, and sepsis
Curren EJ , Lutgring JD , Kabbani S , Diekema DJ , Gitterman S , Lautenbach E , Morgan DJ , Rock C , Salerno RM , McDonald LC . Clin Infect Dis 2021 74 (4) 723-728 Diagnostic stewardship means ordering the right tests, for the right patient at the right time to inform optimal clinical care. Diagnostic stewardship is an integral part of antibiotic stewardship efforts to optimize antibiotic use and improve patient outcomes, including reductions in antibiotic resistance, and treatment of sepsis. CDC's Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion (DHQP) hosted a meeting on improving patient safety through diagnostic stewardship with a focus on the use of the laboratory. The meeting identified emerging issues in the field of diagnostic stewardship, raised awareness of these issues among stakeholders, and discussed strategies and interventions to address the issues-all with an emphasis on improved outcomes and patient safety. This white paper summarizes the key takeaways of the meeting including needs for diagnostic stewardship implementation, promising future avenues for diagnostic stewardship implementation, and areas of needed research. |
Framing Bacterial Genomics for Public Health(care).
Halpin AL , McDonald LC , Elkins CA . J Clin Microbiol 2021 59 (12) Jcm0013521 Advancements in comparative genomics have generated significant interest in defining applications for healthcare-associated pathogens. Clinical microbiology, however, relies on increasingly automated platforms to quickly identify pathogens, resistance mechanisms, and therapy options within CLIA- and FDA-approved frameworks. Additionally, and most notably, healthcare-associated pathogens, especially those that are resistant to antibiotics, represent a diverse spectrum of genera harboring complex genetic targets including antibiotic, biocide, and virulence determinants that can be highly transmissible and, at least for antibiotic resistance, serve as potential targets for containment efforts. U.S. public health investments have focused on rapidly detecting outbreaks and emerging resistance in healthcare-associated pathogens using reference, culture-based, and molecular methods that are distributed, for example, across national laboratory network infrastructures. Herein we describe the public health applications of genomic science that are built from the top-down for broad surveillance, as well as the bottom-up, starting with identification of infections and infectious clusters. For healthcare-associated, including antimicrobial-resistant, pathogens, we propose a combination of top-down and bottom-up genomic approaches leveraged across the public health spectrum, from local infection control, to regional and national containment efforts, to national surveillance for understanding emerging strain ecology and fitness of healthcare pathogens. |
Associations of facility-level antibiotic use and hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile infection in US acute-care hospitals, 2012-2018
Kazakova SV , Baggs J , Yi SH , Reddy SC , Hatfield KM , Guh AY , Jernigan JA , McDonald LC . Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021 43 (8) 1-3 Previously reported associations between hospital-level antibiotic use and hospital-onset Clostridioides difficile infection (HO-CDI) were reexamined using 2012-2018 data from a new cohort of US acute-care hospitals. This analysis revealed significant positive associations between total, third-generation, and fourth-generation cephalosporin, fluoroquinolone, carbapenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam use and HO-CDI rates, confirming previous findings. |
Performance Evaluation of Serial SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Testing During a Nursing Home Outbreak.
McKay SL , Tobolowsky FA , Moritz ED , Hatfield KM , Bhatnagar A , LaVoie SP , Jackson DA , Lecy KD , Bryant-Genevier J , Campbell D , Freeman B , Gilbert SE , Folster JM , Medrzycki M , Shewmaker PL , Bankamp B , Radford KW , Anderson R , Bowen MD , Negley J , Reddy SC , Jernigan JA , Brown AC , McDonald LC , Kutty PK . Ann Intern Med 2021 174 (7) 945-951 BACKGROUND: To address high COVID-19 burden in U.S. nursing homes, rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests have been widely distributed in those facilities. However, performance data are lacking, especially in asymptomatic people. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing when used for facility-wide testing during a nursing home outbreak. DESIGN: A prospective evaluation involving 3 facility-wide rounds of testing where paired respiratory specimens were collected to evaluate the performance of the BinaxNOW antigen test compared with virus culture and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Early and late infection were defined using changes in RT-PCR cycle threshold values and prior test results. SETTING: A nursing home with an ongoing SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. PARTICIPANTS: 532 paired specimens collected from 234 available residents and staff. MEASUREMENTS: Percentage of positive agreement (PPA) and percentage of negative agreement (PNA) for BinaxNOW compared with RT-PCR and virus culture. RESULTS: BinaxNOW PPA with virus culture, used for detection of replication-competent virus, was 95%. However, the overall PPA of antigen testing with RT-PCR was 69%, and PNA was 98%. When only the first positive test result was analyzed for each participant, PPA of antigen testing with RT-PCR was 82% among 45 symptomatic people and 52% among 343 asymptomatic people. Compared with RT-PCR and virus culture, the BinaxNOW test performed well in early infection (86% and 95%, respectively) and poorly in late infection (51% and no recovered virus, respectively). LIMITATION: Accurate symptom ascertainment was challenging in nursing home residents; test performance may not be representative of testing done by nonlaboratory staff. CONCLUSION: Despite lower positive agreement compared with RT-PCR, antigen test positivity had higher agreement with shedding of replication-competent virus. These results suggest that antigen testing could be a useful tool to rapidly identify contagious people at risk for transmitting SARS-CoV-2 during nascent outbreaks and help reduce COVID-19 burden in nursing homes. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None. |
- Page last reviewed:Feb 1, 2024
- Page last updated:Apr 29, 2024
- Content source:
- Powered by CDC PHGKB Infrastructure